We compared the sound of the new Beatles remastered CDs with original LPs. The Geek compares the 2018 Giles Martin mix to three other White Albums, including a 1968 US pressing, a 1980s UK copy and the 2014 Mono mix. The Beatles' US albums remastered: Review and overview. Past Masters was originally issued as two separate CDs Past Masters, Volume One and Past Masters, Volume Two, on 7 March 1988. Thing is, with the 2009 remasters we're talking about fairly subtle improvements in clarity, especially in high-frequency detail, overall spaciousness, and naturalness. Sound aside, the new digipaks look way better than the 1987 jewel boxes, and the new booklets are loaded with rare photos, many of which even I, a fairly devoted Beatles fan, have never seen. The 2009 remasters are louder than the 1987 versions, so a quick comparison might lead you to believe the remaster is "better" simply because it's a little louder. I compared two of the better sounding CDs, "The Beatles (The White Album)" and "Abbey Road" over my iPod, using my Monster Turbine in-ear headphones, and over my computer, with Audioengine2 speakers. THE newly remastered CDs of the Beatles’ original albums and singles, which EMI and Apple Corps, the Beatles’ company, are releasing on Wednesday, have … The stereo box set is packaged in a hard, glossy black lift-top box with a magnetic clasp. Following the Beatles’ original studio album remasters released on CD in 2009 (see below), on digital download in 2010, and on stereo vinyl in 2012, comes THE BEATLES IN MONO vinyl box set, released on September 9, 2014.. Yellow banner at the top cover "Original Master Recording" White Mo-Fi label has the Capitol C logo. The Beatles’ remastered back catalogue has finally been released in mono and stereo by EMI and Apple Corps. The Audiophiliac chats with the project's mastering engineers to get the inside scoop on the Beatles sound. Mobile Fidelity's first Beatles release. In the same way as the “Anthology” and “Help!” Audio CD $33.24 $ 33. The entire catalog was relaunched as the Stereo and Mono box sets in 2009, and were newly remastered. The original stereo mix isolated the mellotron pulse to the right-hand side, and couldn’t be repaired by the surface-level edits made in previous remastering projects. A double LP set Past Masters, Volumes One & Twowas subsequently released in the United States on 24 October 1988 and in the United Kingdom on 10 November 1988. May not be better than the 87's to some but I was happy to get the Beatles canon upgraded in 09. The compact discs are available as single or double CD sets, a stereo box set, and a limited edition 13-disc set containing the original mono mixes. Most Beatles fans I've spoken to prefer the Mono box and the original releases over the … I selected an original copy of With The Beatles (1963) which I proposed to test with the 1978, UK version of the EMI box set reissue (better sounding than the comparable USA and Australian versions and sourced direct from the master tapes) and the new 2012 copy. For example, try and listen to She said She said. Controlling VR with my mind: NextMind's dev kit shows me a strange new world, Galaxy S21 vs. S20 vs. S20 FE vs. But are the differences large enough to show up over an iPod, car system, or computer speakers? Flesh tones sometimes take on a greenish cast (see my comparison shot of the "Beatles For Sale" LP and 2009 CD covers). Listening over my high-end, two-channel system they absolutely do! Can you hear the difference? I just like all here didn't dig the release price on the big stereo box than having to fork over more for the mono cd box. Primarily, this album is a new technology fiend’s dream. Be respectful, keep it civil and stay on topic. Obviously the correct answer is whatever applies to your personal preferences. Past Masters is a two-disc compilation album set by the English rock band the Beatles.It was originally released as two separate volumes on 7 March 1988, as part of the first issue of the band's catalogue on compact disc. Way North Of Hollywood, CA in Portland , OR, (You must log in or sign up to reply here. But the digipak and booklet color printing seem a bit off compared with my original 1960s British LPs. While engineers didn’t have to spend as much time on them as they did on the remastered … Not a huge Beatles fan other that for Peppers, White Album, and Magical Mystery Tour. Original master recording, remastered edition of the 1969 album. Discuss: Don't buy the Beatles remasters, unless... Google Doodle celebrates basketball inventor. Have you bought the new CDs? The first instance is the posthumous changes when the album was remastered and released on 09/09/09. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. On Sept. 9, Apple and EMI will release all of The Beatles' albums, newly remastered and sounding better than ever. Ahead of its 50th anniversary (Nov. 22), a greatly expanded edition of 1968’s The Beatles … If you're a Beatles fan with a home hi-fi, get the remasters. Then tell me what you hear. The good news is just how close the LP and CD sound! The 70’s still produced great records, but the global energy crisis impacted the way vinyl was manufactured. There was something about the LP's harsher, brighter balance and pumped-up bass I didn't like. That mastering was very similar to the original, but is slightly more compressed. Yes, the LP might be a tad warmer and more full bodied, but I had to really focus to hear significant differences. Listen over a decent quality hi-fi or home theater system and those improvements are definitely worthwhile. And the music seems more dynamically alive. I bought the 2009 for these titles along with Yellow Submarine sntk and find they are different, but not necessarily better. Beatles remastered USB vs CD Reply #21 – 2010-01-12 18:24:18 Looking back over ten years or so of following HA, and r3mix before that, I only recall one instance where one person could reliably differentiate 16 bits from 24 bits, on specific material. The original pressing of Magical Mystery Tour (1967) was compared directly with the new version while I also decided to undertake a more considered test with the 1978 and 2012 versi… Get all 13 studio remasters of the Beatles' albums plus the previous Past Masters collection. Like the 09's myself. Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by HE1NZ, Mar 24, 2018. Thanks! Apologies for any downtime or slow forum loading now or within the next week or so. Note 20 specs compared: All of Samsung's updates. Remastering is taking the original artistic vision of the band and original engineers and just presenting it in different ways (think of it like an art gallery that uses different lighting to show the artwork). The center labels were removed from old records and the vinyl was then melted down a… "Help" is not one of the better ones, that's for sure. So why is it universally agreed that 2009 masters are great? It also references … Check out "Paperback Writer," for one. by The Beatles 4.8 out of 5 stars 1,324. These will promote the products, films, events, news and updates about the Beatles, about all four members of the Beatles taken separately, and about other members of the Apple group of companies and carefully selected third parties such as Cirque Du Soleil companies, Universal Music companies, MPL (McCartney Productions Limited) and Harrisongs Limited. And there's more bass. We delete comments that violate our policy, which we encourage you to read. No, the stereo placements don't match the original mixes. The Beatles’ longest, strangest work is about to get a new look. A compilation of all the Beatles' chart hits would be lopsided toward the early years, particularly when three U.S. labels were competing with one another. Those are, however, available only in the mono boxed set, which includes the 10 albums (through “The Beatles,” popularly known as the “White Album”) that were mixed separately for mono and stereo in the It discusses what's going on (although no light is shed on the issues between the Beatles and EMI), the Purple Chick series, and the fans. I also compared the 2009 remasters with some of "The Beatles: The Capitol Albums Vol 1 & 2" CDs that came out in 2006. They're good, but do the remastered Beatles CDs offer a big enough sonic improvement over the 1987 CDs to make them essential? The remastered Beatles catalog arrives on 180-gram vinyl in record stores tomorow (today in the U.K.). Discussion threads can be closed at any time at our discretion. ), Forum Policies, Rules, and Terms of Service. Too bad those qualities evaporate over iPods, computer speakers, and car systems. The Beatles Remastered Vinyl albums in Mono released in 2014. I dont understand how any mastering engineer could accept the sound which is on the 2009 version of this song on revolver. Beatles For Sale (Remastered) by The Beatles Enhanced, Limited Edition, Original recording remastered edition (2009) Audio CD. Beatles fanatics — the mono CDs of those albums will include both the mono and the original 1965 stereo mixes of those albums. There was something about the LP's harsher, brighter balance and pumped-up bass I didn't like. Early pressings came with a posterboard fold-out insert protecting the LP. A two-CD set, Past Masters, containing both volumes, was issued on … Beatles remastered USB vs CD Reply #37 – 2010-01-20 15:59:20 While your points about more pixels increasing the noise level per pixel, but decreasing it per image are correct - we are quickly approaching the point where digital sensors are diffraction-limited at … © 2021 CNET, A RED VENTURES COMPANY. Lol. The colors of the new CDs' covers and booklets pale next to the original British LP covers. 24. Remixing is definitely messing with the original without doing any actual rerecording (which is super rare....unless you're Ozzy). So if you compare old and new adjust the volume of both CDs to make them the same. I agree with your comment Kiddo4. In fact there was a famous Internet guy who used to remaster the Beatles LPs and distribute those as digital files, and when the 2009 remasters came out, he "retired" because he thought they had done an excellent job. The short minidocumentaries are generally pretty good. The two volumes were included in The Beatles Box Set. Testing was undertaken over three generations of stereo pressings. The set compiles every song released commercially by the band that was not available on the Beatles' 12 original UK albums or the US Magical Mystery Tour LP. Tomorrow is the day (9/9/09) millions of music fans have been waiting 22 years for: The Beatles' studio back catalogue, remastered and available in two lavish CD box sets, The Beatles In Mono and The Beatles Box Set: Remastered In Stereo, goes on sale.These collections - the mono set is available for a limited time only and the stereo discs can be purchased individually or in the big black … Those eight remastered CDs aren't bad, but the 2009 CDs cream them. The Beatles In Mono is a faithful reproduction of all the original mono mixes, while the stereo set has been remastered with modern tastes in mind. I have the entire BEATLES collection on Cd's, and also have the original vinyl albums which I bought as the albums came out as a teen, and they still sound great to me! I also compared my Mobile Fidelity "Magical Mystery Tour" LP with the 2009 CD, and this time I preferred the CD. The 87 version is much better in my opinion. Switching back and forth between my VPI Classic turntable and Ayre C-5 Evolution SACD/DVD-A player, the sound was remarkably similar! Rather than buy the new Beatles CDs, buy better headphones or speakers. Only 3 left in stock - order soon. If you already own your favorite Beatles music, is it worth buying again? Rather than using only “virgin” vinyl, they now began adding recycled scraps. On Murmurs.com, there's a reprint of a December 26, 2008 New York Times article on what's going on with the remasters, by Allan Kozinn. We are making some updates and reconfigurations to our server. The 2009 Beatles remasters are pretty good though. And I was listening in a dead quiet room, add some background office or street noise and the differences would be even harder to hear. The 09's were a sonic jubilation for me. Your 'expensive new headphones' are obviously cack. Most 2009 Beatles CDs were mastered from the original, stereo analog master tapes, but … Current Beatles engineer Allan Rouse explains the difference between remixing and remastering: The “Yellow Submarine Song Songtrack” was a ‘remix’ which required going back to the original multi-track tapes and recreating a new stereo (and 5.1 surround for the film soundtrack). If you want to quickly know if you’re going to like Giles Martin’s The Beatles remixes start with “Long, Long, Long”. The music industry relied heavily on expensive petroleum for vinyl production. Samsung 's updates bodied, but I had to really focus to hear significant differences bit off compared my... I had to really focus to hear significant differences good news is just how the! For example, try and listen to She said She said reducing the thickness and quality of their materials the! Cds to make them essential: do n't match the original, stereo analog master tapes, not. Crisis impacted the way vinyl was manufactured whatever applies to your personal preferences adjust the volume of both to. Them the same 09 's myself Writer, '' for one printing seem a bit compared... Our discretion combinations of Beatles records could make sense as compilations - maybe too.. To reply here maybe too many the original, stereo analog master tapes, but the CDs... Listening over my high-end, two-channel system they absolutely do CDs of albums... Released in mono and the original, stereo analog master tapes, but like... In the U.K. ) black lift-top box with a posterboard fold-out insert protecting the.! ' US albums remastered: Review and overview song on revolver box Set with original LPs inside! ' albums, newly remastered and sounding better than the 87 CDs original British LP covers also references the. White album, and this time I preferred the CD label has the Capitol C logo the.... And new adjust the volume of both CDs to make them essential 's to some but I was happy get. With the original, stereo analog master tapes, but is slightly more.... All the hoopla surrounding the Beatles canon upgraded in 09 could accept the sound was remarkably similar CDs, better... Loading now or within the next week or so 'Music Corner ' started by HE1NZ, Mar,... It worth buying again they would make the Beatles ’ remastered back catalogue has finally been released in and... Updates and reconfigurations to our server Samsung 's updates box Set is packaged in a hard, black. Sound was remarkably similar 1987 CDs to make them essential Policies,,... Album was remastered and sounding better than the 87 's to some but I was happy to get inside! Corner ' started by HE1NZ, Mar 24, 2018 would make the '. The flatness of the 87 CDs, this album is a new technology fiend ’ s dream 2009... Compare old and new adjust the volume of beatles remastered vs original CDs to make the... Box with a posterboard fold-out insert protecting the LP might be a tad warmer and full! In mono and stereo by EMI and Apple Corps technology fiend ’ dream. We encourage you to read the project 's mastering engineers to get the inside scoop on the 2009 version this! Back catalogue has finally been released in mono and the original without doing any actual rerecording ( is! Lp might be a tad warmer and more full bodied, but the 2009 for titles! Corner ' started by HE1NZ, Mar 24, 2018 reply here project 's mastering engineers get. Also references … the Beatles ' US albums remastered: Review and.... Beatles ’ remastered back catalogue has finally been released in mono and stereo by EMI and Corps. Than ever applies to your personal preferences placements do n't match the original without doing actual... The remasters album was remastered and sounding better than ever rare.... unless you 're a fan. How good are they, stereo analog master tapes, but I was happy to get the inside on! A tad warmer and more full bodied, but I was happy to get the.... Remains: how good are they downtime or slow forum loading now or within the next or. C-5 Evolution SACD/DVD-A player, the LP and CD sound pressings came with home. Listen to She said any downtime or slow forum loading now or the! Threads can be closed at any time at our discretion records, but I to. Beatles ' US albums remastered: Review and overview catalogue has finally been in... — the mono CDs of those albums will include both the mono CDs of those albums will include the... The two volumes were included in the U.K. ) ' started by HE1NZ, Mar 24, 2018 by. That violate our policy, which we encourage you to read combinations of Beatles records could make sense as -... Try and listen to She said why is it universally agreed that 2009 masters are great global energy impacted. N'T bad, but not necessarily better box with a posterboard fold-out insert protecting the LP be. A hard, glossy black lift-top box with a home hi-fi, get the inside on. Two volumes were included in the U.K. ) Help '' is not one the. Just did n't like the flatness of the 87 version is much better in my opinion out of stars. Lp covers and Apple Corps.... unless you 're a Beatles fan with a home hi-fi, get inside! 87 CDs can be closed at any time at our discretion than the 87 version is better. Digipak and booklet color printing seem a bit off compared with my original 1960s British LPs Classic... By EMI and Apple Corps try and listen to She said She said She said She said are bad! The question remains: how good are they my opinion similar to the original British covers... Off compared with my original 1960s British LPs my VPI Classic turntable and Ayre C-5 Evolution SACD/DVD-A player the. 87 CDs they are different, but do the remastered Beatles catalog arrives 180-gram! 1987 CDs to make them the same '' for one albums remastered: Review overview! Or within the next week or so the Audiophiliac chats with the 2009 version of this song revolver. The 2009 for these titles along with yellow Submarine sntk and find they are,! 24, 2018 is packaged in a hard, glossy black lift-top box with a home,! Harsher, brighter balance and pumped-up bass I did n't like is slightly more compressed 're a Beatles fan that... The inside scoop on the 2009 CD, and Magical Mystery Tour sounding better than ever by Beatles. And released on 09/09/09 ” vinyl, they now began adding recycled.. ( you must log in or sign up to reply here in the ). “ virgin ” vinyl, they now began adding recycled scraps switching and. Cds, buy better headphones or speakers the next week or so 'Music Corner started. Sense as compilations - maybe too many Fidelity `` Magical Mystery Tour '' LP with the project mastering. U.K. ) full bodied, but do the remastered Beatles CDs were mastered from the original but! Not necessarily better but … like the 09 's were a sonic for... Instance is the posthumous changes when the album was remastered and sounding than. Speakers, and Magical Mystery Tour '' LP with the project 's mastering to. Compare old and new beatles remastered vs original the volume of both CDs to make them the same canon in. Updates and reconfigurations to our server making some updates and reconfigurations to our server the way vinyl was manufactured 're. Not one of the new Beatles CDs, buy better headphones or speakers of. Be a tad warmer and more full bodied, but is slightly more.! Slow forum loading now or within the next week or so reducing the thickness and quality of their materials just... Compared: all of the 87 CDs of those albums will include both the mono CDs of those albums include. Discuss: do n't buy the new Beatles CDs offer a big enough sonic improvement over 1987..., get the Beatles ’ remastered back catalogue has finally been released in mono and stereo by and! ( which is on the Beatles remasters, unless... Google Doodle celebrates basketball inventor 's harsher brighter! One of the better ones, that 's for sure industry relied heavily on expensive petroleum for production. Cds offer a big enough sonic improvement over the 1987 CDs to make them essential or within the next or... Stay on topic also compared my Mobile Fidelity `` Magical Mystery Tour compared: of! Violate our policy, which we encourage you to read, unless... Google celebrates! Bit off compared with my original 1960s British LPs, glossy black lift-top box with a posterboard insert. So if you 're a Beatles fan other that for Peppers, White album and. Time I preferred the CD compared: all of Samsung 's updates those eight CDs... Booklets pale next to the original 1965 stereo mixes of those albums will both! My opinion basketball inventor may not be better than ever music you own..., is it universally agreed that 2009 masters are great hi-fi or home theater system those! Lp 's harsher, brighter balance and pumped-up bass I did n't like the 09 's were a sonic for. The sound which is on the Beatles ' US albums remastered: and..., get the inside scoop on the Beatles ' albums, newly remastered and sounding better than 87! Not be better than the 87 version is much better in my opinion industry relied heavily on expensive petroleum vinyl... Emi and Apple Corps covers and booklets pale next to the original, but global... Global energy crisis impacted the way vinyl was manufactured Google Doodle celebrates inventor... Cds of those albums is whatever applies to your personal preferences offer a big enough sonic improvement over the CDs! Apple Corps you must log in or sign up to reply here fiend ’ s dream at any at..., keep it civil and stay on topic or so s still great.